See how patients use RELiZORB to support their tube feeding
By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies to personalize your experience and to analyze website traffic. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.
This study was a retrospective evaluation of the real-world use of RELiZORB with enteral feeding among 57 neonates and infants aged <1 year at treatment initiation.† The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline in World Health Organization (WHO) weight z-score at 12 months.1,‡
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 96 patients who initiated RELiZORB at >60 centers in the US between 2020 and 2024.1
Out of 96 patients, 10 discontinued RELiZORB use and 57 had weight assessments at baseline and 3, 6, 9, or 12 months (efficacy population).1,§
The demographics and baseline characteristics for the ITT population were comparable to those for the population used to evaluate efficacy.1
Of the 57 patients who used RELiZORB with enteral nutrition1:
For neonates and infants, use of RELiZORB with enteral feeding regimens demonstrated1,§:
Mean change in weight z-score1,||
Mean change in weight percentile1,||
Real-world evidence (RWE) offer valuable insights into the safety and effectiveness of a product in a real-world clinical setting. The RWE analyses presented here were conducted using validated methodologies to minimize confounding, control biases, and ensure data integrity. RWE is observational by nature and can only demonstrate association, not causation. Findings derived from RWE should be evaluated alongside all other available clinical trials and data.
No new safety concerns were identified among patients under 1 year of age who initiated RELiZORB.1
SEM=standard error of mean.
| * | Use of RELiZORB was shown to normalize concentrations to levels consistent with a reference range based on healthy subjects as shown in the literature.2,3 |
| † | Data extracted from Alcresta’s insurance claims database examined RELiZORB use between January 2020 and July 2024 at more than 60 centers in the United States.1 |
| ‡ | The ITT population corrected gestation age, weight, and weight z-score mean (min, max) at the time of RELiZORB initiation was 5 months (-2.2, 11.9), 5.36 kg (1.63, 10.93), and -2.23 (-6.71, 1.39).1 |
| § | Of the 96 ITT patients, 10 discontinued RELiZORB use (6 for parent/clinician decision, 1 for “lack of efficacy,” and 3 for “reason not provided/other”), yielding a 10% rate of discontinuation for potential intolerance.1 |
| || | Mean (SEM) change in baseline-adjusted weight with RELiZORB use. The baseline level prior to RELiZORB start is subtracted for each treatment period, so that each point on the graph represents the change from baseline. Number of patients at baseline was 57, at 3 months was 47, at 6 and 9 months was 36, and at 12 months was 30. Statistically significant changes from baseline (one-sample two-sided t-test P<0.05) are indicated with a paragraph mark (¶).1 |
This study was a retrospective evaluation of real-world data that was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of RELiZORB on nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).4
In this review, 100 patients with CF aged 0-45 years who used RELiZORB from 2018-2019 were evaluated. Of these patients, 93 patients aged 2 to 18 years had growth assessments at baseline and 12 months of use.* For these patients, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) use for oral meals and snacks was unchanged.4
Use of RELiZORB demonstrated4:
Change from baseline at 6 and 12 months following initiation of RELiZORB4
Graph was generated by Alcresta based on Sathe MN. JPGN. 2021.
Use of RELiZORB also demonstrated statistically significant greater improvements in height and weight z-scores from 0 to 6 months compared with a historical cohort (CFFPR-2014†) using PERT with enteral nutrition4
Real-world evidence (RWE) offer valuable insights into the safety and effectiveness of a product in a real-world clinical setting. The RWE analyses presented here were conducted using validated methodologies to minimize confounding, control biases, and ensure data integrity. RWE is observational by nature and can only demonstrate association, not causation. Findings derived from RWE should be evaluated alongside all other available clinical trials and data.
BMI=body mass index; LS=least-square.
| * | Weight, height, and BMI were normalized to age- and sex-specific z-scores and percentiles of healthy individuals 0 to 24 months of age using the WHO Child Growth Standards and for those 2 to 20 years of age using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts.4 |
| † | Historical cohort data obtained from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry during the 2014 calendar year (CFFPR-2014) as this data does not include the use of RELiZORB. To be included, patients had to have at least 2 measurements of height and weight at least 6 months apart and not be receiving treatment with ivacaftor.4 |
497 study†: A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover treatment period with a follow-up safety period was used to evaluate safety, tolerability, and fat absorption with RELiZORB in patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) due to CF.1
Changes in plasma concentrations of DHA and EPA1
DHA and EPA were used as measures in the studies as they are strongly correlated with overall fat absorption.
2.8-fold overall increase in total DHA and EPA vs placebo (AUC0-24h; P<0.001)2
GI Events1
Gastrointestinal (GI) events are expressed as number of events (number of patients reporting events).
57% reduction in the incidence of diarrhea from Period A to Period C2,†
RELiZORB demonstrated2:
DHA=docosahexaenoic acid; EPA=eicosapentaenoic acid.
| * | Use of RELiZORB was shown to normalize concentrations to levels consistent with a reference range based on healthy subjects as shown in the literature.2,3 |
| † | 497 Study consisted of 3 distinct periods. Period A lasted 7 days and was meant to establish a baseline while patients maintained their standard PERT dosing along with overnight tube feeding. Period B lasted 11 days (including a 7-day washout period before crossover) and evaluated the effect of RELiZORB use on fat absorption via DHA and EPA plasma measures. Period C lasted 7 days and evaluated the safety and tolerability of RELiZORB by comparing outcomes with Period A (baseline).1 |
498 ASSURE Study: A 90-day, multicenter, open-label study, in which RELiZORB was used with overnight tube feeding, that evaluated the safety, tolerability, and improvement in fatty acid status in red blood cell (RBC) membranes in patients with EPI due to CF.3
Changes in erythrocyte membrane fatty acid composition (%) for Omega-3 index3
2.1-fold increase in RBC uptake of DHA and EPA relative to total fatty acid composition in erythrocyte membranes1,3
Sustained use of
RELiZORB in 498 Study3
61% of participants demonstrated improvement in weight percentiles.3,‡
With sustained use of RELiZORB:
All exploratory efficacy outcomes, including serum levels of fat-soluble vitamins A, D, and E in plasma total protein, prealbumin, albumin, and transferrin, were within normal ranges at study entry and remained so throughout the 90-day study treatment period.3
| * | Use of RELiZORB was shown to normalize concentrations to levels consistent with a reference range based on healthy subjects as shown in the literature.2,3 |
| † | P<0.001 for difference from baseline to Day 30, Day 60, and Day 90.3 |
| ‡ | Overall, weight and BMI z-scores and percentiles were not significantly different from baseline to Day 90. However, 20/33 (61%) patients had improvement in weight z-scores and percentiles in the ITT population.3 |
Evaluated tolerability and fat absorption with use of RELiZORB during a single tube feeding.
Evaluated tolerability and fat absorption with use of RELiZORB following 12 consecutive nightly tube feedings.
DHA & EPA plasma concentrations following use of RELiZORB during a single tube feeding1,*
The clinical significance of these findings has not been determined.1
RELiZORB demonstrated1:
| * | Study conducted in a porcine model over 24 hours measured results of a single tube feeding (500 mL; 4 hours, 120 mL/hr) administered through RELiZORB compared to an identical tube feeding that was not administered through RELiZORB.1 |
| † | Parallel group study conducted in a porcine model measured results of nightly tube feedings (750 kcal) administered over 12 consecutive days with (n=6) and without (n=5) use of RELiZORB.1 |
Evaluated RELiZORB for improvement in fat and nutrient absorption with continuous tube feedings.
Evaluated use of RELiZORB in conjunction with bolus tube feedings in weaning parenteral nutrition (PN).
The decrease in PN calories coincided with an increase in enteral nutrition advancement5,†
The clinical significance of these findings has not been determined.1
RELiZORB demonstrated:
EN=enteral nutrition.
| * | Parallel study with 3 groups: no intestinal resection (n=5), 75% resection (n=5), and 75% resection plus RELiZORB (n=5). After recovery, the animals were treated for 14 days. Piglets received 60% of calories from continuous enteral nutrition and 40% from chow.1 |
| † | Parallel study conducted in a porcine model consisting of 2 groups: 75% intestinal resection (n=6) and 75% resection plus RELiZORB (n=5). PN was initiated post-operatively and was decreased as enteral nutrition was advanced. Enteral nutrition was delivered daily via 6 bolus feeds with or without RELiZORB for 14 days.1 |
| ‡ | No statistically significant difference in CFA between resected animals receiving RELiZORB and unresected animals in the control group (87.1% vs 95.2%, p=0.19).1 |
| § | In the preclinical study, intestinal length increased on average by 68.4 ± 19.1 cm (19.5 ± 5.5%) compared with 0.8 ± 18.3 cm (0.7 ± 5.2%) in the control group (P=0.03).5 |
Caleb, a child who tube feeds with RELiZORB, and his parents, Kayleigh and Jimmy
See how patients use RELiZORB to support their tube feeding
References: 1. RELiZORB. Instructions for use. Alcresta Therapeutics, Inc; 2025. 2. Freedman S, Orenstein D, Black P, et al. Increased fat absorption from enteral formula through an in-line digestive cartridge in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;65(1):97-101. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000001617 3. Stevens J, Wyatt C, Brown P, Patel D, Grujic D, Freedman SD. Absorption and safety with sustained use of RELiZORB evaluation (ASSURE) study in patients with cystic fibrosis receiving enteral feeding. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67(4):527-532. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000002110 4. Sathe MN, Patel D, Stone A, First E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of in-line immobilized lipase cartridge in enterally fed patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021;72(1):18-23. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000002984 5. Tsikis ST, Fligor SC, Hirsch TI, et al. A digestive cartridge reduces parenteral nutrition dependence and increases bowel growth in a piglet short bowel model. Ann Surg. 2023;278(4):e876-e884. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005839 6. Tsikis ST, Fligor SC, Secor JD, et al. An in-line digestive cartridge increases enteral fat and vitamin absorption in a porcine model of short bowel syndrome. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(5):1093-1101. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.03.026
Review full product information for RELiZORB in the Instructions for Use.